fbpx

Must Read and Watch: Classic Christie

Jason Zengerle’s in depth piece on Governor Chris Christie in New York Magazine.

Christie speaking at the Republican Governors Association about his meeting with NJEA President Barbara Keshishian after the head of the Bergen County Teachers Association sent out the email praying for Christie’s death.

Hat tip to InTheLobby for the video.

Christie will be live on NJ 101.5 with Eric Scott this evening at 7 for the month Ask The Governor program. Scott has taken a critical tone towards the Governor lately.  The show should be classic.  Listen on the radio or watch it here.

Got a question for the Governor?  Submit it to NJ101.5 here.

Posted: November 22nd, 2010 | Author: | Filed under: Chris Christie | Tags: | 3 Comments »

Here comes payback

By Art Gallagher

Governor Chris Christie is on the receiving end of some Chicago style political payback from the Obama administration machine.

With his rising national star power, and his “put up or shut up” message to the new Republican majority in the House of Representatives, Christie has become the strong spine of the Republican Party.  Obama needs to tarnish Christie’s image and weaken his spine if he is to co-opt the House Republicans into compromise.

Christie is clearly in the Obama machine’s opposition radar.  We saw that in August when they quickly released a video of NJ’s education delegation’s testimony defending the flawed “Race to the top” application as a rebuke to Christie placing the blame on the failed application on the U.S. Education Department.  That was Obama injecting himself into local politics and creating turmoil for the Governor.  Christie came out of the controversy stronger by launching his Reform tour throughout the State, with the facebook/Oprah splash and by hitting the campaign trail for Republicans nationally and locally with a back breaking schedule.

Yesterday we saw the news of a Justice Department audit that criticised Christie for overspending on travel, by $2,176 over 14 trips, while U.S. Attorney.  Today we see the news that the U.S Transporation Department sent cash strapped New Jersey a bill for $271 million, plus penalities and interest and an audit to follow looking for more, for federal money spent on the ARC project that Christie terminated last month.

Also today, we see a new Quinnipiac poll showing Christie’s approval ratings in NJ holding steady at 51%, while Obama’s disapproval ratings hit 50% for the first time.

The Quinnipiac poll also said that 61% of respondents said that Christie would not make a good President,that 60% say he will not run for President in 2012 and 67% think the Christie for President talk is political gossip.  With polls like these it is all in how word the question.  I interpret this poll to mean that over 60% of New Jersey voters are taking Christie at his word that he is not running in 2012 and his own assessment that he is not ready to be President.  I take the responses to mean that New Jersey wants Christie to finish the job he started here before moving on.

I would love to see the results of a poll that asked “Who is more qualified to be President?  A 2008 Barack Obama or a 2010 Chris Christie?

Christie will likely get stronger as a result of the latest Obama machine strike.  Keep an eye out for more anti-Christie news coming out of Washington, especially in the days following Christie appearances on national TV.

Posted: November 9th, 2010 | Author: | Filed under: Chris Christie, Obama | Tags: , | 1 Comment »

Christie’s Travel As U.S. Attorney Criticised Again

In a reprise of an issue from last year’s gubernatorial campaign, Governor Chris Christie’s travel expenses while U.S. Attorney have been criticised in a Justice Department Audit.

The audit says Christie over spent by a total of $2,176 over 14 trips.  12 of those trips involved cases that earned the government $311 million in civil penalties.

I wonder how much the audit cost.

The Asbury Park Press has the story.  The APP gives the story much more prominent coverage than they did the ReGen story  that involved Senators Robert Menendex, Frank Lautenberg and Congressmen Frank Pallone and Steve Rothman pressuring the FDA to approve an unsafe medical device in exchange for campaign contributions.

Posted: November 9th, 2010 | Author: | Filed under: Chris Christie, Frank Pallone | Tags: , , , | 1 Comment »

Kyrillos Bill to Expand Business Retention and Relocation Assistance Grants Advances

Legislation proposed by Governor Christie and sponsored by Senator Joe Kyrillos (R-Monmouth) and Senator Fred Madden (D-Gloucester) to expand financial assistance grants for current and prospective New Jersey employers has advanced in the Assembly. “An Act concerning the Business Retention and Relocation Assistance Grant Program” (BRRAG), S-2370, would broaden the availability of state financial assistance for those employers who wish to expand operations in or relocate to the State of New Jersey. The bill’s Assembly companions (A-3389, A-3391) were heard today in that chamber’s Commerce and Economic Development Committee.

“With New Jersey’s unemployment rate at 9.4%, state government must use all tools at its disposal to create and retain jobs,” said Senator Kyrillos. “I am proud to join Governor Christie’s efforts to make New Jersey more affordable for job creators by sponsoring this bi-partisan piece of legislation with Senator Madden. Our proposal increases the tax credits available to employers who wish to invest in our great state and expands eligibility for the program. By reducing the corporate and insurance tax burden on job creators, we can change the business climate in New Jersey and put people back to work. Far too many of our friends and neighbors are in search of meaningful employment, and we must do everything possible to motivate job opportunities and the state’s economy.”

BRRAG provides credits against corporate taxes levied on businesses for those employers that retain jobs scheduled for elimination, expand operations, or relocate from another state to New Jersey. Senator Kyrillos’s bill eliminates various caps and restrictions on BRRAG grants in an effort to expand eligibility and participation under the program. In addition, the proposed changes would allow participating businesses to utilize credits for capital purchases under certain circumstances. The plan is scheduled for a hearing in the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee on November 15, 2010.

Posted: November 8th, 2010 | Author: | Filed under: Chris Christie, Joe Kyrillos, Press Release | Tags: , | 1 Comment »

In Case You Missed It: Governor Christie on “Meet The Press”

 

Only 43 Days Left to Enact Governor Christie’s Reform Agenda

 

Governor Chris Christie – “What they [Republicans] have to do is what they say they want, and we’re doing it in New Jersey: smaller government, less spending, less regulation, lower taxes.”                                                                                                                       

 

Governor Christie on ‘Meet the Press’

 

 

Governor Christie on ‘Meet the Press’ – Part 2

 

***

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

DAVID GREGORY: We now turn to the aforementioned Republican who has emerged as a leader of his party, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie.

Welcome to the program.

 

GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE (R-NJ): Thank you, David.

 

GREGORY: Good to have you here.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Happy to be here.

 

GREGORY: When you talk about the response from the voters on Election Day, something’s very curious. We know some of the feelings about the Democrats, about President Obama’s policies, but look at this from the exit polls in terms of the opinion of political parties. Republicans didn’t fare too well either; 52 percent unfavorable rating. What does that say about the Republican Party today?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: You know, I think what it says is what I was saying all over the country, that’s it’s put up or shut up time for our party. You know, we lost our way last decade, David, we did, and people expect us to do better. And if the Republican Party wants to come back, they’re going to have to do what they said they were going to do. I mean, because if they don’t, we’re going to be sent to the wilderness for a long time, and we’re going to deserve it.

 

GREGORY: What does that mean? What do they have to put up?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: What they have to do is what they say they want, and we’re doing it in New Jersey: smaller government, less spending, less regulation, lower taxes. That’s what the public is saying that they want. And if you look at what we’ve done in New Jersey, David, we’re delivering on that. We’re not fixed yet, but we’re on the track to being fixed, closing an $11 billion budget deficit without any new or increased taxes, cutting the corporate business tax. We’re doing things to try to create an environment where private sector jobs can grow.

 

GREGORY: And, and I want to talk about some of the choices you made in New Jersey. But, you know, you heard Senator DeMint, and there’s a lot of Republicans talking about cutting the deficit, cutting the budget, but they’re not specific. He wasn’t specific. He talks about Paul Ryan, who has some ideas about Medicare and changing the way that’s structured, indeed, making some cuts. Paul Ryan in the House, he’s from Wisconsin, doesn’t have support among establishment Republicans. There are 15 Republicans who stood up behind him in terms of making these cuts. Are Republicans really making good when Senator DeMint and others aren’t specific about the cuts they’re going to make to entitlements or to defense, to the big ticket items that really move the budget?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Well, let me tell you what’s–where the leadership’s going to come from. You have 11 Republican governors and a Democratic governor, Andrew Cuomo in New York, who have said we can’t raise taxes and we have to cut spending in everything. In New Jersey what we did was we cut spending in every department, a 9 percent cut in real spending, not projected spending, real spending year over year. Find another state that did that and, and we’ll go and talk about it. I mean, we made real hard decisions, and I cut some programs that we would’ve liked to have kept.

 

GREGORY: Mm-hmm.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: But we’re broke. We don’t have the money anymore. And so I hope that what these governors, Republicans and Democrats, will show Washington is you can do this and you have to do it.

 

GREGORY: I asked Senator DeMint about sacrifice, and he said, `Oh, we don’t want to, we don’t want to break our promise to our seniors. In your state, what are you telling people they have to sacrifice and what do Republicans around the country have to tell Americans they have to sacrifice if they want to bring the size of government under control and the deficit under control?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: We told everybody there has to be shared sacrifice among everyone, and let me be specific. We cut every department of state government. We cut funding to K to 12 education. We are proposed real pension and benefit reforms on public sector workers, increasing the retirement age, eliminating COLAs, things that are really going to bring the pension problem back under control. We cut all of this spending in the state in every state department, David, every state department. From environmental protection, to military and veterans affairs, all the way through had to sustain a cut. Those are the type of things you have to do to show people you really mean shared sacrifice. Everyone came to the table and everybody had to contribute.

 

GREGORY: So, as you, as a national Republican with national influence now–and you’ve met with congressional Republicans and talked about issues–does everything have to be on the table?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: What I told them was they’d better come up with a plan that’s credible like we did in New Jersey, and the public’s going to be able to smell real quickly if you’re not credible. And if we are not credible, then we are really going to be in trouble as a party, and I think the numbers you showed indicate that.

 

GREGORY: What about the tea party, the tea party’s influence on the Republican party? Net positive, net negative? What do you think?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Net positive. Listen, the core that drives the tea party, in my view, are those four principles I talked about before–less spending, smaller government and less intrusive government, lower regulation, and lower taxes. And when Republicans are at their best, those are our core principles. And so I think that, at bottom, it’s a positive influence. Listen, you’re going to have variances around, around the country. I endorsed Mike Castle in the primary…

 

GREGORY: Right, in Delaware.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Yes.

 

GREGORY: Right.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Because I felt he was the best person.

 

GREGORY: Is that a wake–do you agree with Lindsey Graham from South Carolina or Jim DeMint from South Carolina, that Delaware is a wake-up call for Republicans?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: I think Delaware was a missed opportunity to have a really good United States senator in Mike Castle, and that’s why I endorsed him in the primary.

 

GREGORY: Let me talk a little bit more about New Jersey and taxes and spending. And I want to talk specifically about the–this ARC tunnel, this rail tunnel that would’ve connected New York and New Jersey and the controversy surrounding this. To boil all of this down, the federal government, as I understand it, offered you a deal. You were worried about cost, cost overruns, and they said, “Look, we’re going to take care of that. New Jersey’s not going to be responsible.” So critics have used…

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Whoa, let me stop you right there.

 

GREGORY: Yeah.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: No chance. That never happened. The federal government said $3 billion is what they were going to give us, and I had to sign a contract saying every nickel over $3 billion was the responsibility of the federal government. All the federal government offered me in the interim two week period, between the time when I first canceled the tunnel, was the ability to get federal loans…

 

GREGORY: Mm-hmm.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: …that we’d have to pay back.

 

GREGORY: They weren’t going to shift this to…

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: No.

 

GREGORY: …private companies to be able to take care of it?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: No. It was federal loans or, if we wanted a public-private partnership, we had to have increased fees on all the train tickets, for all the commuters, all across New Jersey, including ones that weren’t using the tunnel, to be able to repay it. No matter what, David, this was going to fall on the people of the state of New Jersey, and the worst part was, it was a blank check. No one could tell me how much this was going to cost. We had already put $5.7 billion up from the state of New Jersey, and we were talking about $2 billion to $5 billion in overruns now. I mean, we could not sustain that. We’re broke.

 

GREGORY: Is this a matter of ideology for you, or simply a pragmatic issue that you don’t have the money? And by that I mean, should the federal government be involved in big infrastructure projects like this?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Sure, they should. And you know what? I gave the federal government two weeks to come back to me and say if this is a project of such national importance, then put more money on the table for it. But, you know, they didn’t. In, in Florida, where they’re building high speed rail, Florida’s being asked to give a 20 percent match to an 80 percent for federal. In this project, New Jersey was picking up 70 percent of the cost, the feds 30 percent and nothing from the state or the city of New York. Listen, this is about fairness and about what we could afford, and I’m not going to sign blank checks on the taxpayers in the state of New Jersey for a project that, as laudable as it might be in some respects, we simply can’t afford now. When we talked to the campaign, David, about tough choices, this is an example.

 

GREGORY: Tax cuts. You’ve got a millionaires tax in New Jersey, which I know that you’re opposed to.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Not anymore, we don’t.

 

GREGORY: Not anymore because…

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: No.

 

GREGORY: …you vetoed it.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Yes.

 

GREGORY: You’ve got high taxes across the board.

advertisement | ad info

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: We do.

 

GREGORY: How do you deal with that as a Republican governor of New Jersey?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Well, first you say, “No more.” And the Democrats sent me an extension of the millionaires tax that would have not only hit individuals but small business in New Jersey, and I vetoed it. And I’m not going to increase taxes on the state that the Tax Foundation has said is the highest burdened tax state in America, especially if you look at our unemployment rate, David, ours is higher than any state in our region. The reason is, over the last eight years under Corzine and McGreevey, we raised taxes and fees 115 times. We put a wet blanket on the economy of New Jersey, and that’s why our people are still out of work disproportionately to everybody else in the region. New York is a point lower. Pennsylvania is more than a point lower. I mean, we, you know, we did this to ourselves with all these increased taxes.

 

GREGORY: What about the Bush tax cuts and extending those? You’ve said that should happen at all levels for a couple of years, but you’ve said only a couple of years because there is a day of reckoning here. Can you have tax cuts when you also want to balance the, the budget? Or do you have to consider tax increases at the federal level at some point?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Well, you know, I’ve been watching you for weeks talk about extending the Bush tax cuts. Drives me crazy when I’m sitting at home. This is about maintaining the current tax structure in a time we have a very weak economy. And so I favor extending these for another two years, extending the current tax system and not having a tax increase…

 

GREGORY: But those, I mean, wait a minute. It may drive you crazy, and I know other Republicans that feel the same way. But I’ve also talked to Republicans. I’ve talked to economists like Alan Greenspan who say there is no free lunch here. You cannot have tax cuts at this level and not have them be paid for. And other Republicans say, yes, they should be pay for. So you do agree they should be paid for.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Well, obviously–well, listen, I’ve, I’m walking the walk in New Jersey, David.

 

GREGORY: OK.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: I mean, when I said we’re vetoing the millionaires tax, I found spending tax to pay for that.

 

GREGORY: So you can have existing tax policy, but it still has to be offset.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Well, listen, and I’m not disagreeing with you, David.

 

MR. GREGORY: OK.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: But I’m–what I’m disagreeing with you is you characterizing what’s happening here as a–as tax cuts. This is maintaining the current tax policy in a weak economy, and what you’re, what you’re advocating through your question is tax increases.

 

GREGORY: Right. I’m not–that’s not fair. I’m not advocating. I’m, I’m questioning whether or not they have to be paid for.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Well, when you call the, when you call the tax cuts, what I’m saying is the–I take the position as the opposite of that.

 

GREGORY: Right. Right.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: The opposite of that is it is a tax increase in a weakened…

 

GREGORY: But they are set to expire.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: …weeks in, in a weakened economy. And what I’m saying is you should keep the current tax structure in place until our economy gets stronger.

 

GREGORY: That’s fine. But they’re set to expire, so if you’re going to re-authorize them, they’re, they’re, you’re voting for tax cuts.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: No, you’re not voting for tax cuts. You’re voting to maintain the current tax structure.

 

GREGORY: I understand, a continuation.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: That’s a…

 

GREGORY: But there’s…

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: And then we agree.

 

GREGORY: And there’s still an offset issue.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Well, then we agree.

 

GREGORY: OK. The, the issue of where there’s room for negotiation, is there room for negotiation in your mind? Should the president make a deal here on, on these things for a certain period of time? Does everybody, then, in a couple of years have to come to this and say, “Maybe these aren’t the best ideas. Maybe we also have to think about tax increases at some point”?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Well, I think the first thing that the president has to focus on is building private sector jobs again in this country. And I don’t think, by increasing taxes, that’s the way to–that we’re going to get it done in the short term. And so, sure, there’s areas for compromise, I’m sure there are, between Republican leaders in the Congress and the president. But the president has to lead on this. And I think that the message is really clear, I got the message from the election, it’s about putting people back to work. And you will not put people back to work in private sector jobs by increasing the cost in the private sector.

 

GREGORY: A couple more areas. I want to–you’ve become an YouTube star, as you well know, because you’ve had some, some interactions with voters, including when you were campaigning for Meg Whitman out in California. Let me show that moment.

 

(Videotape, September 22, 2010)

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: You know what, you want to yell, yell at me, but don’t give her a hard time. We’re here. We’re here talking about the future of the state of California and the future of our country. And you know what?

 

Unidentified Man: And you’re just talking about the truth that’s she’s lying about.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: And you know what? And you know what? Let me tell you, and let me tell you this. You know what? It’s people who raise their voices and yell and scream like you that are dividing this country. We’re here to bring this country together, not to divide it.

 

(End videotape)

 

GREGORY: So what’s the balance? On to a style question. The balance for you being a straight talker, you know, taking on the corrosive conversations we have about politics, and then your image as being a little too brusque, bullying, you know, Governor Wrecking Ball? How do you, how do you straddle that line?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Well, I am who I am. I don’t straddle the line. And I think what people in New Jersey appreciate about, appreciate about me is I don’t send smoke signals. They know who I am. They know how I feel about issues. Sometimes they agree with and sometimes they don’t, but all I think that that clip indicates is that when I have something on my mind, I’m going to say it. I’m going to say it directly. And I think that we have too little of that in politics, David. And when, when I sit around and watch the way some people in political life talk, it, it fogs me over. And I think it fogs people in America over too. They want to hear somebody say, “If you feel a certain way, say it and live with the consequences.” I’m willing to let the chips fall where they may on that issue.

 

GREGORY: So the question is whether you’re going to say all this stuff at a national level. You’ve ruled out running for president in 2012. But you’re also acting like a guy who’s increasing your national influence. You’re campaigning for congressional Republicans. Why do all of that? Why, especially in tight races, if you’re not looking down the line at running?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Because I care about my country, and because I felt that those people where the absolute best candidates to help make our country a better place. And so that’s why I campaigned for them. I have no other agenda. And to the extent that New Jersey over the last year can serve as an example to people that say, “Listen, you can cut spending. You can balance a budget without tax increases. You can make hard choices and not only survive politically but thrive politically.” Then I want to try to set that example for folks so that these other new governors who are coming in, members of Congress…

 

GREGORY: Mm-hmm.

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: …that they will act boldly and be strong.

 

GREGORY: Shermanesque statement, you’re not running in 2012?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Absolutely.

 

GREGORY: You wouldn’t be on a ticket at all as VP?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Can you see me as somebody’s vice president, David, after, after that question about governor wrecking ball? I would feel bad for that poor man or woman.

 

GREGORY: What about down the line, beyond 2012? What, what criteria would you use in making a decision about whether to run for president?

 

GOV. CHRISTIE: Well, first I have to decide whether I run for re-election in 2013 in New Jersey, and that’s going to be determined by how good a job I do and whether the people in the state of New Jersey want me back. So before you ever get to anything beyond that, you know, my mother always taught me first things first. Do your job. Do your job that

Posted: November 8th, 2010 | Author: | Filed under: Chris Christie | Tags: | Comments Off on In Case You Missed It: Governor Christie on “Meet The Press”

Anna Little Rally With Governor Christie

Before a crowd that overflowed into the streets of Port Monmouth, Anna’s Army of volunteers and supporters rallied this evening at Bachstadt’s Tavern.

Posted: November 1st, 2010 | Author: | Filed under: Anna Little, Chris Christie | Tags: , | 2 Comments »

Rally With The Governor Tonight

Governor Christie will be rallying Anna Little, Sheriff Shaun Golden, Freeholder Rob Clifton, Mayor Tom Arnone, Mayor Gerry Scharfenberger and Kevin Settembrino and hundreds of their supporters at Bachstadt’s Tavern, 8 Bray Ave, Middletown. 

The event starts at 7PM. 

In Middlesex County, Governor Christie Stops at the Middlesex County Victory Office with Scott Sipprelle and the Middlesex County Republican Ticket

Start Time: 6:30PM

Location: Middlesex County Victory Headquarters

4095 Route 1 South
Located in the South Brunswick Square Mall
Monmouth Junction, NJ

Posted: November 1st, 2010 | Author: | Filed under: Anna Little, Chris Christie, Gerry Scharfenberger, Rob Clifton, Scott Sipprelle | Tags: , , , , , , | Comments Off on Rally With The Governor Tonight

Monmouth University Poll: Sipprelle Slipping

By Art Gallagher

The gap that Scott Sipprelle needs to close in order to return Rush Holt’s career to plasma  has widened from 5% to 8%  in the last two weeks, according to a Monmouth University Poll released this afternoon.

Holt has widened his support in Middlesex County to 10%, 52%-42% vs a 4 point margin, 50%-46% in the earlier poll.  Sipprelle still leads among Independents in the district, but only buy 11% vs 15% two weeks ago.

“While he’s not out of the woods yet, Rush Holt appears to be solidify his standing among voters in this district,” said Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute.

That’s a puzzling conclusion from Murray, given that Holt’s support has remained constant at 51% in the two polls Monmouth conducted.  “Undecided and other” have doubled as a percentage of respondents in the current poll, from 3% to 6%.  Among Independents, “undecided and other” has increased from 7% to 9%.   Rather than Holt solidifying his support, it would appear that Holt’s negative ads have been taking on toll on Sipprelle’s support and/or that Scott has failed to give Independents a reason to come out for him over the last two weeks.

The most surprising number both of Murray’s NJ-12 polls is Sipprelle’s favorability rating.  In the October 13th poll, 41% of the respondents did not know enough about Scott to form a favorable or unfavorable opinion, including 44% of Independents and 24% of Republicans.  In today’s poll, the “no opinion” number dropped only 2 points to 39%, including 42% of I’s and 24% of R’s.  This is particularly surprising given Sipprelle’s radio and TV advertising throughout the summer and fall.

Just as Holt is “not out of the woods,” Scott has not been knocked out and can still win this race, though time is running short.  Fast, and expensive adjustments are necessary for him to win.

Scott needs to “let it hang out”  and let the Independent voters know the more human side of himself.  Elections are not won on debating points.  To a large extent they are won on likeability.   Scott has been argumentative and a bit strident since the second debate.  He’s argued with Holt’s commercials and he’s argued with the Asbury Park Press.  He’s been defending himself instead of convincing the voters he’s going to fight for them.  The “I don’t know and I don’t care” clip from the second debate that Holt is using on TV hurts.  It shows a side of Scott that those who challenged him back in convention season saw a great deal of, but that the electorate does not need to see in the closing days of the campaign.   A feel good, emotion provoking TV spot with his family and voters could turn the tide.  It would have to be written, produced and booked tomorrow, but Scott has the resources to make that happen.

Focus on increasing the turnout in Monmouth County where Scott has a 60%-35% lead, according to Murray.  Let Holt have Trenton and the rest of Mercer.  Any resources spent there are a waste at best and possibly counterproductive in the last four days of the campaign. Close the gap with Middlesex Independents with the new ad.  Play it during  NFL games if there are spots available.

Play this ad as often as possible:

Posted: October 28th, 2010 | Author: | Filed under: Chris Christie, Rush Holt, Scott Sipprelle | Tags: , , , , | 4 Comments »

Christie Sinks ARC. Pallone Is Disappointed

Trenton, NJ – Today, Governor Chris Christie accepted the recommendation of NJ Transit Executive Director Jim Weinstein to continue the orderly and expeditious shutdown of the ARC Project. Despite intense negotiations with federal and state participants, no agreement was reached on terms that would assure New Jersey’s taxpayers would not pay more than $2.7 billion for a completed Trans Hudson Express ARC project.

Phoney Palloney (Falsetto Frankie to Soprano State fans) is disappointed:

 

Frank Pallone Jr. Disappointed to hear Governor plans to cancel ARC tunnel at a time when New Jersey needs more mass transit options.

Well, if Pallone had any clout in Washington after 22 years, maybe he could have gotten the Feds to cover the cost over runs on the project.   Or maybe he could have gotten his friends in the New York delegation to lean on Albany to contribute their fair share to a project that would have benefited New York more than it would have helped NJ anyway.  Think of all those tax dollars New Jersey residents would have been paying to New York after we spent $15 billion dollars to give them a way to leave the state to go to work.

As our friend Harold Kane,  the next Middlesex County Clerk, pointed out last week, New Jersey has 40 million square feet of vacant office space.  What do we need to spend billions of dollars to send people to work in New York for?

Christie did the right thing and come Tuesday Pallone is going to be despondent.

Posted: October 27th, 2010 | Author: | Filed under: ARC, Chris Christie, Frank Pallone, Harold Kane | Tags: , , , | Comments Off on Christie Sinks ARC. Pallone Is Disappointed

Look who is covering Little and Pallone!

The Asbury Park Press has a front page piece about the Monmouth University Poll on CD-6.  There is even a positive headline for Anna Little,
Poll: Little closing in on Pallone in 6th District race.  Good for the Nudniks, they easily could have written, Little still trailing Pallone.

They’re probably trying to get back into the CNN news feed.

Actually the credit should go to Patrick Murray.  The Nudnik article was basically a rewrite of his press release for the poll.

With this line, Frank Pallone will need to bet on a strong turnout in more Democratic areas of this district to fend off this challenge,” Murray acknowledged that the incumbent is not winning this race.  The poll predicts a strong Democratic turnout in its sample.  Such a turnout can not be counted on.

There is no question this race will be determined on turnout.  As my friends at InTheLobby write today, Independents are siding with Republicans nationally by 14%.  In NJ-6, Little leads Pallone by 21% among Independents, according to Murray. Up from 14% three weeks ago.  The increase in support among Independents correlates with Little’s increased name recognition.  Three weeks ago, 45% of the voters had no opinion of her. Now that number is down to a still very high 31%.

Frank Pallone is on the verge of losing to a relative unknown.  As Little becomes more known, her support swells.  She’s easy to vote for, despite Pallone and Barbara Buono trying to paint her as extreme and out of the mainstream.

Murray credits the “Anna’s Army” ground game, lead by “General” Russ Cote, as the reason that Little has closed the gap so significantly in three weeks.  There is no question that The Bayshore Tea Party’s passionate and tireless troops continue change the political landscape of Central Jersey.  If Anna wins, they will have made that unpredictable result happen.

However, also contributing to Anna’s surge is Governor Christie’s personal involvement in the campaign, and Frank Pallone’s own TV ads. Pallone’s “positive” ad emphasises how out of touch he is with the district.  In my own unscientific poll of 5 CD-6 voters, 80% said they were less likely to vote for Pallone after seeing the ad. 20% were undecided.  Pallone’s “negative” ad attacking Little is a complete failure.  100% do not believe Little is the extremist Pallone portrays her to be. The ad can’t help but increase her name recognition.

Finally, Diane Gooch’s ad for Voice For My Child , while not mentioning Little, has given Independents an additional reason to vote against Pallone.

Little’s TV advertising will start airing tomorrow.  Her direct mail pieces have been going out for the last week.  She is poised to win this, but still needs help. 

Do what you can to get out the vote for Anna Little in CD-6.  Donate, talk to friends and family, email your friends links to her ads.  As Governor Christie has repeatedly said, we don’t want to wake up on November 3 regretting the one thing we didn’t do. 

If you’re in CD-12, or know people who vote in CD-12, do the same for Scott Sipprelle.  Send them the link to this ad.

Posted: October 26th, 2010 | Author: | Filed under: Anna Little, Asbury Park Press, Chris Christie, Frank Pallone, Monmouth University Poll, Patrick Murray, Scott Sipprelle | Tags: , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Look who is covering Little and Pallone!