Rush Holt Champions Infanticide

By Abram N. Spangel

The Ku Klux Klan isn’t the only clan that Rush Holt has been caught frolicking under the sheets with. Holt is also in cahoots with the Rockefeller clan, in particular the Laurance Spencer Rockefeller cell. With their common connection to West Virginia and obsession with UFOs and infanticide, Holt and the Rockefellers formed a tight alliance. Larry Rockefeller and his wife have funded Holt’s current bid for re-election to the maximum extent possible.

With Rush Holt at a safe distance, there is now nothing wrong with West Virginia. Believing in UFOs is perhaps harmless but is nevertheless as wacky as Holt’s fetish with toilets. However, Holt’s and Rockefeller’s obsession with infanticide is truly despicable and should qualify as a crime against humanity. A well documented overview of Holt’s murderous rampage against newborn babies, as evidence by his votes in the House of Representatives, is available here.

Both Holt and Rockefeller are supporting-Princeton Professor Peter Singer-the world’s foremost promoter of gratuitous infanticide and murder of the disabled. Rockefeller sponsored the Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Professorship at Princeton University’s Center for Human Values which harbors Singer. Many of Princeton’s benefactors refused to make further donations of their own money to Princeton as long as Peter Singer remains on its faculty.

Singer has been lambasted by Simon Wiesenthal, the President of the National Federation of the Blind, and leading German intellectuals who compared Singer’s “ethics” to Nazism. With these credentials and Holt’s history of hate, it is not surprising that Holt is supporting Singer by diverting millions of taxpayer dollars to Princeton University.

 Here are some of Singer’s statements:

  • “Infants lack rationality, autonomy and self-consciousness. Killing them, therefore, cannot be equated with killing normal human beings, or any other self-conscious beings.”
  • “When the death of a disabled infant will lead to the birth of another infant with better prospects of a happy life, the total amount of happiness will be greater if the disabled infant is killed…. Killing a disabled infant is not morally equivalent to killing a person. Often, it is not wrong at all.”


  • “Some animals are worth more than some humans. A smart border collie is worth more, inherently, than a retarded child.”


  • “We should recognize that the fact that a being is human, and alive, does not in itself tell us whether it is wrong to take that being’s life.”

When it comes to the protection of our babies and young children, Holt’s policies are in effect no more nuanced than the partial birth abortion that Charles Manson performed on Sharon Tate.

Posted: September 16th, 2010 | Author: | Filed under: Holt, Uncategorized | 3 Comments »

3 Comments on “Rush Holt Champions Infanticide”

  1. Gary from Jersey said at 11:09 am on September 16th, 2010:

    This is beyond ghastly philosophizing; this is eugenics, the Margaret Sanger theory that some, like blacks, the infirm or mentally disabled, pollute the gene pool.

    Sanger justifies institutional murder in a very sick and dangerous way and from a place that can’t or won’t remove him. That Holt would even be in the same room with him is repulsive and damning.

  2. Rick Ambrosia said at 8:01 pm on September 16th, 2010:

    Maybe THIS post should have been labeled “How low can you go” instead of the one underneath.

    You’re really stretching here…and, you have no shame. Again, you’re dispicable.

    Since Little is aligning herself with Sharron Angle, then she must believe that Alcohol is as dangerous as a controlled and addictive drug, hence, she believes in taking away our God given right to choose a LEGAL substance and must think for us.

    Its really the same thing as your idiotic post.

  3. George . McGaloway III said at 4:37 pm on September 18th, 2010:

    Only a Democrat could compare prohibition of alcohol to infanticide.