N.J. court blocks cops’ dashboard videos, many reports from public release
Posted: June 11th, 2015 | Author: admin | Filed under: Crime, New Jersey, News, NJ Courts | Tags: Dash Cam video, New Jersey, NJ Courts, OPRA | 2 Comments »Key excerpts from N.J. Supreme Court ruling on pensions
Posted: June 9th, 2015 | Author: admin | Filed under: New Jersey, New Jersey State Budget, NJ Constitution, NJ Courts, NJ Supreme Court, Pensions | Tags: NJ Supreme Court, Pension and Benefit Reform | 6 Comments »Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments about Payments to Public-Worker Pensions
Posted: May 7th, 2015 | Author: admin | Filed under: Christie Administration, New Jersey, New Jersey State Budget, NJ Constitution, NJ Courts, NJ Judiciary, NJ Supreme Court | Tags: Chris Christie, Christie Administration, NJ Pension Payments, NJ Supreme Court | 1 Comment »Judge rules Christie must restore $1.5B cut to pension payments in N.J. budget
Christie decries pension ruling as ‘liberal judicial activism’
New School-Funding Case Turns Spotlight on State’s Rural Districts
Municipal Judge Accused of Judicial Misconduct
Judge Peter A. Locascio, the Municipal Court Judge in Atlantic Highlands and Highlands, has been accused of Judicial Misconduct by the Disciplinary Counsel of the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct (ACJC). The complaint can be found here.
Locascio is accused of exhibiting “extreme and personal” hostility towards an attorney appearing before him starting in August of 2008 and extending through early 2013, for failing to rule on recusal motions by that attorney after he was ordered to do so by his Assignment Judge, of using the powers of his office to his personal benefit and of conflicts of interest in allowing his personal attorney, a close personal friend, to appear before his court.
The attorney involved was not named in the complaint. “It could be several people,” said one member of the Monmouth County legal community speaking off the record, “Locascio is known to be caustic and vindictive.”
A complaint by the ACJC disciplinary counsel is an indication that an investigation into the initial complaint produced enough evidence to warrant an hearing before the committee. If after the hearing the committee determines that the Judge did violate the Code of Judicial Conduct the matter is referred to the State Supreme Court for public reprimand, censure, suspension, or removal. If the committee finds after its hearing that there is not clear and convincing evidence of Judicial Misconduct, it makes a recommendation to the Supreme Court to dismiss the complaint with or without private reprimand.
Posted: August 12th, 2014 | Author: Art Gallagher | Filed under: Atlantic Highlands, Highlands, Monmouth County, Monmouth County Court, NJ Courts, NJ Judiciary | Tags: ACJC, Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct, Atlantic Highlands, Highlands, Judge Peter A. Locascio, Judicial Misconduct, Peter Locascio | 2 Comments »A crazy June: Things to look out for in Trenton this month
TRENTON — Hold onto your seats. It’s June in Trenton, and that’s always a bumpy ride. With the state budget due by month’s end, horse-trading is rampant as just about everything that was proposed all year long under the Statehouse dome is up…
Chris Christie’s court pick has a pro-choice, anti-free press record
Don’t look now, but our self-avowed “pro-life” governor just nominated a pro-choicer to the state Supreme Court. I’m not talking about Chief Justice Stuart Rabner, the liberal Democrat whom Christie reappointed in a deal with the Democrats. If Rabner…
Explainer: How Do Our Judges Make It to the Bench in New Jersey?
The current judicial crisis offers and excellent opportunity to take a look at how New Jersey chooses and installs its judges — and how that process differs from many other states. In 38 states, at least some appellate and major trial court judges…