fbpx

Henry Vaccaro Responds To The Neptune Nudniks’ Editorial

By Henry Vaccaro, Sr

I just saw an OP Ed story in the Press entitled “The Deadly sins of the Tea Party.

I take strong exception to that story.  In fact I resent it.

Had it not  been for the Tea Party Obama would have had a ” Clean” bill to raise the debt limit, without any spending cuts .

The Press has a very short memory.  Obama’s last budget called for Trillions in new debt. It was voted down in the Senate 94 to 0. We the United States of America are working without a budget. That budget proves that he had no intention of reducing the debt. Just more spending as usual.

The Press said “compromise.” I say “BULLS SHIT”. It’s about time that someone stood up for their principles. The Tea Party stood up to be counted.

At the Alamo, Col. Travis drew a line in the sand with his sword and challenged 180 men to cross the line if they were willing to fight and die for their freedom. They showed the world what Patriot’s stood for.

You the former Asbury Park Press have shown the world how bias the news media really is. You mention the Koch brothers “Oil barons and billionaires who have supported the Tea Party”. I did not see any mention of George Soros and the billions he has spent to further his and Obama’s agenda.

I am a proud member of the Tea Party; you have called us rowdy, rude and disruptive at town hall meetings. Maybe we didn’t like Obamacare being rammed down our throats, with all the backroom deals going on just for votes. There was NO open debate. Where were you the Asbury Park Press defending our freedom?

You say that it is time for the Tea Party to learn a lesson. We have learned a good lesson.

See you in 2012.

More from my site

Posted: August 7th, 2011 | Author: | Filed under: Asbury Park Press, Neptune Nudniks | Tags: , | 8 Comments »

8 Comments on “Henry Vaccaro Responds To The Neptune Nudniks’ Editorial”

  1. Rick Ambrosia said at 11:47 am on August 8th, 2011:

    Yet, you didn’t dispute the fact that taxes are at the lowest level in 60 years. And why? Because you can’t. Also, this downgrade is a direct result of Tea Party freshmen emboldened by a feeding frenzy of scare tactics orchestrated by a few of the more radical members..ie: Michele “crazy eyes” Bachmann and that darling of the Teas…Sarah”no, really, I’m still undecided” Palin.

    Nice work Tea Partiers. I have said all along that republican radicals want nothing short of the total destruction of the American way of life…and they are well on their way to achieving that goal. Again, nice work.

  2. brian said at 4:03 pm on August 8th, 2011:

    Right—and Paul Revere caused the British to come, Betty Ford clinic causes substance abuse, Ford causes car accidents, hard work causes poverty, cutting spending runs up defecits———-the list is endless………

  3. Henry V Vaccaro said at 4:19 pm on August 8th, 2011:

    Rick you can say that Obama inherited the financial mess .But he also inherited a country with a AAA Credit Rating.If not for Tea Party Their would have beer NO REDUCTION in Debt.As Obama wanted a “Clean Bill “.

  4. Rick Ambrosia said at 5:00 pm on August 8th, 2011:

    Yes, Henry…just like every other President has received, but certainly, not for THIS President. Also, the downgrade was a direct result of the debt limit being held hostage. If you don’t think Tea Party politics played a part in this downgrade..then I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

  5. Henry V Vaccaro said at 9:01 pm on August 8th, 2011:

    Rick How much is the Bridge in Brooklyn.

  6. Rick Ambrosia said at 10:24 pm on August 8th, 2011:

    $2.5 trillion dollars. Please make the check out to me. Thank you.

  7. Bob English said at 12:16 am on August 9th, 2011:

    In its release, S&P took Republicans to task for using the debt ceiling as a political football and refusing to consider new revenues as an option for reducing the country’s long-term deficit. As The National Journal put it, “it’s hard to read the S&P analysis as anything other than a blast at Republicans.”

  8. brian said at 9:07 am on August 9th, 2011:

    Well, if the National Journal has weighed in then l guess the debate is settled—was the huffington puffington post too busy to comment…………..