Historic audit of N.J. mail-in election is complete. The results are promising, officials say.
Mariel Hufnagel said she asked for a recount after losing her bid for Eatontown Borough Council by just 10 votes in November not because she suspected foul play.
Rather, the Democratic challenger said it was because the margin was simply too thin to risk letting what could have been a few chance counting errors defy the will of the people, particularly in an unprecedented election conducted almost entirely via mail-in balloting in response to the coronavirus pandemic. As it turned out, the recount only confirmed Hufnagel’s defeat. But she accepted the results, after the accuracy of the initial…
More from my site
Next Up: Major Contact-Tracing Program to Keep the Virus in Check?
N.J. bail reform opponents lose first challenge to overhaul enacted by Christie
NJ readies for widespread inoculations when coronavirus vaccine arrives
Incumbent, challenger elected to Highlands Borough Council
Why can’t N.J. re-open its motor vehicle agencies like other states already have?
A Role for Retired Officers as Pandemic Depletes Police Departments
Bill to legalize recreational marijuana in N.J. set to be unveiled
N.J. teachers layoffs must be based on seniority, not performance, judge rules
Here’s N.J. lawmaker’s plan to legalize recreational marijuana after Christie leaves
O’Scanlon: Trenton Dems to blame for NJ’s credit downgrades
So they confirmed the count that included phony ballots sent in by dead people, illegal immigrants and people that have moved. Whoopty-doo.
Ya know what sucks….when it is proven that there was a fair election and there was no issues….Besides NJ this was seen and proven in the other states where there were questionable questions as to the election. So no dead people, no illegals immigrants, and no people that moved….so suck it up and move on!