fbpx

Hot Pants

mostly-falseIf all press is good press, then Anna Little’s fledgling U.S. Senate campaign got a boost this morning when  The Star Ledger’s PolitFact gave her claims about Senator Robert Menendez’s spending and borrowing record a “MOSTLY FALSE” rating on the TRUTH-O-METER.

Little avoided the “PANTS ON FIRE” designation the Ledger gives for completely false claims, but earned the newly created Hot Pants designation from MMM.

What is most surprising about this morning’s PolitiFact post is that it has been up at NJ.com for two hours and it doesn’t have any comments from Rullo supporters, yet.

More from my site

Posted: January 8th, 2012 | Author: | Filed under: 2012 U.S. Senate Race | Tags: , , , , , , | 7 Comments »

7 Comments on “Hot Pants”

  1. Chaz said at 11:04 am on January 8th, 2012:

    Rullo exposed the Menendez cashins with Dwek and operation bid rig hudson buddies. We need someone who is going to be accurate and swift to the punch. She is going to make a fool out of the republican party. Menendez ain’t no joke between the money and his con game. The guy holds no punches and is honest even if its painful.

  2. Joe Who? said at 11:36 am on January 8th, 2012:

    Hey Joe-

    The above comment is unintelligible. Like much of your website.

    Please stop posting about yourself, Joe.

  3. Sancho Panza said at 1:54 pm on January 8th, 2012:

    Just where on Little’s Senate campaign Website is she supposed to have said, “”Bob Menendez just voted to increase the government’s debt ceiling to $1.9 TRILLION! In his 19 years in Congress”?

  4. Eric McDonald said at 4:01 pm on January 8th, 2012:

    Hey Joe who? It is funny how much press rullo is getting for actually standing for something. It is interesting you don’t post your name Anna Army operative. Funny!

  5. Tbone said at 4:05 pm on January 8th, 2012:

    What do you expect Eric? What else does Joe Who’s candidate have besides bad press & blunders. Wonder who she is?

  6. Barty Crouch, Jr. said at 7:15 am on January 9th, 2012:

    Why does anyone dignify Anna Little as a candidate for US Senate? While might make a good freeholder or assembly candidate, she is not a serious candidate for federal office. She wouldn’t win a serious primary, and could not under any circumstances oust Menendez.

  7. Justified Right said at 12:21 am on January 10th, 2012:

    Really Art? PolitiFact? Why not just ask Charles Manson and Lucifer if they have a low opinion of Anna Little?

    These types of self-appointed “fact-checkers” have come after me in the past. Don’t you know that they put thier opinion in the headline, no matter how much the later analysis disproves them?

    Look at this hit piece they did on Anna.

    “Mostly False?” They analyzed 21 pieces of legislation that increased the debt and found Menendez voted for 13 of them.

    Doesn’t his 13 and 8 record make Anna’s statement “mostly true?”

    You know, simple math?

    (I’m not interested in the rebuttals of you or anyone else who won’t address the bad math by politifact and instead just repeat how much they hate her)

    One (more) demerit for you Art on your ALDS (Anna Little derangement syndrome).