Christie makes Gas Tax increase deal with Sweeney and Prieto
file photo
Governor Chris Christie, Senate President Sweeney and Assembly Speaker Prieto announced a deal to replenish the Transportation Trust Fund with a $.23 per gallon gas tax increase this afternoon in Trenton.
In a press release from his office, Christie touted off setting tax decreases in the deal–“tax fairness”– which he said will more than compensate for the gas tax increase.
“I am pleased to present a plan that represents tax fairness for the residents of New Jersey,” said Governor Christie. “This is the first broad-based tax cut for all New Jerseyans since 1994, which is much-needed. At the same time we are going to have constitutionally-dedicated revenue to improve roads, bridges and the mass transit systems in the state.”
The plan includes tax cuts designed to make New Jersey more competitive. The broad-based tax cuts include:
- Sales Tax Cut: On January 1, 2017, the sales tax will go from 7% to 6.875%. The following year on January 1, 2018, , the sales tax will go from 6.875% to 6.625%. A .375% decrease in the sales tax is the first statewide tax cut that has been given in New Jersey since 1994.
- Tax Savings for the Working Poor: Increase the Earned Income Tax Credit for the working poor to 35 percent of the federal benefit amount beginning in Tax Year 2016.
- Tax Savings for Retirees: Increase the New Jersey gross income tax exclusion on pension and retirement income over four years to $100,000 for joint filers, $75,000 for individuals and $50,000 for married/filing separately.
- Eliminate the Estate Tax: Phase out the estate tax over the next 15 months, replacing the current $675,000 threshold with a $2 million exclusion after January 1, 2017 and eliminating the estate tax altogether as of January 1, 2018.
- Tax Savings for Veterans: Provide a personal exemption on state income taxes for all New Jersey veterans honorably discharged from active service in the military or the National Guard.
The people of New Jersey will pay hundreds less in taxes each year while also dedicating money to roads and mass transit. These tax cuts are estimated to save taxpayers $164 million in 2017 and when fully phased-in by 2021 an estimated $1.4 billion.
On the transportation investment side, which will remain flat, a 23-cent gas tax increase costs the average New Jerseyan between $184 and $276 per year, depending on methodology.
With a $2 billion TTF plan in full gear over the next 8 years with 100 percent of gas tax revenues constitutionally dedicated to repair and replace New Jersey roads and bridges, the average New Jersey driver will see a potential reduction of an estimated $600. The state Department of Transportation (DOT) and U.S. DOT have estimated that the average NJ driver spends approximately $600 per year on vehicle repairs caused by bad road conditions.
New Jersey families will see broad-based tax cuts that exceed the dedicated gas tax increases.
The deal must still pass both houses of the legislature.
More from my site
Sweeney and Prieto Agree On A Transportation Trust Fund Deal
Christie says Sweeney and Prieto have not shared their gas tax plan with him
O’Scanlon addresses his critics regarding his declining to vote on the Assembly gas tax bill- Christie Shuts Down Road Construction
Will N.J. trade a higher gas tax for a lower death tax?
Votes by N.J. lawmakers on 23-cent gas tax hike deal stalled until Friday
Christie makes Senate new offer to end N.J. road project shutdown
Christie on the defense as his gas and sales tax plan faces failure
Doherty’s long term support for the gas tax increase, toll hikes and other profitable ventures
In early morning vote, N.J. lawmakers OK sales tax cut, gas tax hike to fix roads
you just assured a Dem victory for governor and the loss of even more legislative seats next year..pathetic.
An almost 200% increase in the gas tax will hurt everyone, especially commuters who must drive to work.
I have no problem with user fees, but I have a serious problem with taking money from the gasoline tax and diverting it from roads and bridges to mass transit.
I also object to the included “marriage penalty” whereby a married couple who are retired will only get a $100,000 pension and retirement income exemption while a couple living together without being married would receive a $150,000 exemption. That is, unfortunately, providing economic incentives for divorce.
We need to watch every legislator to see how they justify this and how they vote.
I don’t see anything that really guarantees that all this stolen money from working commuters will actually only be spent for the so- called purpose! Like so many other “dedicated funds” in this state, a few years down the road, the now-overwhelmingly Dem legislature, starts crying we need more taxes, to repair our “aging infrastructure” that again was let go- because this ruling class of clowns can never cut or STOP the damn social program increases and “giveaways for votes!” Really, it is time to start packing, and find a state with much better stewards of the taxpayers’ dollars!( open to some suggestions, here?)
Here’s a man that did not vote against the last tax increase, now we see a “deal” looming with the Democrats for a 23 cent gas tax.
O’Scanlon has been virtually hiding during his last vote–only coming to MMM with a lame excuse for his “not voting” on this very important matter to the livelihoods of many in this state, and his district.
I expect him to vote what his “master” Chris Christie wants him to do–which would be not voting against the next tax increase, either by voting for it, or not voting against it (really, it’s both the same with the same desired effect).
Declan, the so-called “fiscal conservative” indeed has to go.
Is there nothing that can be done simply & elegantly, without calculations to 3 decimal places, or having dozens of totally separate taxes all tied together? Whatever happened to the idea of protecting consumers, by having the extra gas tax be reduced or eliminated, if the cost of gas went up again above $X/gallon?