Would an Obama immigration order be on firm legal ground?
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is about to flex his muscles on immigration; perhaps, skeptics believe, past the breaking point. As chief of the executive branch, Obama enjoys considerable authority to act on his own in certain areas, including national security and immigration. His predecessors, Republicans and Democrats alike, have employed similar powers. But as the…
More from my site
Five Questions After Obama’s Immigration Speech
Obama immigration order draws split GOP response from possible candidates
Conservative Republicans Resist Boehner’s Plan to Avoid Budget Fight
Unaccompanied Central American Children Showing Up In Freehold
Trump says he’ll ‘suspend immigration’ because of coronavirus, offers no details
Christie to Dreamers: You are an inspiration
Pandering Pallone Lies About U.S. Soccer Team To Boost Amnesty
I’m Conservative and I’m Pro Immigration
Federal Judge dismisses Sanctuary State challenge
Overcrowding crisis: Should N.J overrule voters, approve $33M school expansion?
IMHO NO WAY
And I think one bad sign for Obama is that Johnathan Turley, a noted LIBERAL Constitutional Lawyer will be representing the REPUBLICANS in Congress.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/19/john-boehner-hires-tvs-legal-star-jonathan-turley-/
As to the Shrew Pelosi’s comments in the above article, DESPICABLE; but what else did you expect her to say?
And for those that think Obama’s move is OK because “Reagan & Bush Did It” you may want to look at these:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/11/the-weak-argument-defending-executive-amnesty/382906/
http://www.caintv.com/sorry-liberals-reagan-and-bush