How Much You Want For That Assembly Seat?
By Dan Jacobson, also published in the August 18 edition of the triCityNews
When you’re running for office in America, there’s the inevitable question about the seriousness of your campaign:
How much money are you going to raise?
People are now starting to ask that about me. Because I’m running for the state Assembly as an Independent. And I’ve been getting lots of attention lately by bluntly stating my positions in this space. Exactly as I’ve always done as Publisher of the triCityNews.
In fact, serving as an Assemblyman would be an extension of my work as a journalist. It would provide another platform for my advocacy at the state level. But most rewarding would be how I’d hold the office – with complete independence to say and do what I want. I’d owe no one. And I completely reject politics as we know it today.
Yeah, I admit it. I have some big ambitions here. I want to break the mold of politics in this state.
And that starts with my campaign.
Of course, I’d love to do the actual work of an Assemblyman. But I’m certainly not obsessed with getting elected. And that obsession is what I can’t stand about politicians. I can’t even listen to candidates anymore. It’s too infuriating. In fact, politics today is downright cheesy. I think it’s demeaning to those running. It’s actually embarrassing to watch.
So whether it’s glad-handing at political events, handing out the same old campaign literature, mouthing the typical bullshit or getting caught up in the money chase – I’m rejecting it all. Yup, I won’t do it. And I don’t give a shit. If that’s the only way to win, then I don’t win. No problem. I don’t want the office any other way. I don’t want to be a cheesy politician.
Which brings me back to fundraising.
“Dan will wake some people up,” said powerful Republican blogger Art Gallagher on his More Monmouth Musings blog about my candidacy recently. “But unless he raises and spends some serious money, he will not be a factor.”
Art may indeed be right. The major party candidates, backed by their state party organizations, have been known to spend over $1 million in hotly contested legislative districts. Of course, everyone knows what that money represents – and where it comes from. It’s gross. I know firsthand. I was in such a race 20 years ago in my late 20s when I won one term in the state Assembly. Never again. It’s disgusting.
Look, I’ve stated flat-out that I don’t expect to win. No Independent in New Jersey has won an Assembly seat in 50 years. So the odds are overwhelmingly against me. And conventional wisdom says that you’ve got to raise serious money to be a serious candidate.
Then again, I’m not a conventional guy, and I’ve always rejected conventional thought. I make my own judgments. And I would not run if I didn’t at least think I could win. It is possible.
This is a five candidate race featuring two Republicans, two Democrats and me. We are competing for the two Assembly seats in the 11th District. Voters can vote for up to two candidates. I may get only 10 percent of the vote. Or I may win by 10 votes. Maybe I’ll lose by 10 votes. Perhaps I’ll come in first by 1,000 votes.
I really don’t care. That’s the liberating part. I know exactly how I want to run this campaign. And I know exactly how I’d serve if elected. That’s all set in stone. There’s no deviating from it.
That means winning or losing is out of my hands. As it should be – because I won’t change who I am or what I say to affect the outcome. Got no interest in doing so. That’s why this campaign may have a special resonance with voters if they pick up on it.
My beliefs are united by one thing – a knee-jerk reaction against the concentration of power, wherever it may be found. That includes government employee unions who use mandatory dues to elect those sitting across the bargaining table. That includes powerful corporations that get government favors instead of competing in the free market. It also includes big media – my disgust with the Gannett-owned Asbury Park Press is well-documented. And it includes political parties who order elected officials what to do. I recoil against it all.
As for social issues, I’m pro-choice and in favor of same sex marriage. Government should not be involved in such private matters.
By the way, there will be some money spent on this campaign. I’m not disclosing how much. That will eventually be on the campaign finance reports. But it will certainly not be considered “serious money”. Yup, I want to be that cheap. I’ll owe no one.
Keep in mind, however, that there are two things I know quite well: Communications and politics. In the end, I say my unconventional campaign – run purposely on the cheap – will have as much punch as a conventional one spending $100,000.
Still, is that enough for an Independent to win? Probably not. But it’s not impossible.
So why do this at all?
Here’s my motivation: It would be tremendously satisfying to win this campaign by saying exactly what I think. Literally not changing one word. I’ve never seen that done before. What an accomplishment that would be!
That, in turn, would lead to the most professionally rewarding experience possible in government: Holding an elected office without owing anyone. After running a campaign where you told voters the truth.
That’s the fantasy of all decent people who’d like to serve in public office. And that’s the only way I’m willing to do it.
(The 11th District where I’m running includes: Asbury Park, Long Branch, Red Bank, Ocean Township, Neptune, Neptune City, Interlaken, Deal, Allenhurst, Loch Arbour, West Long Branch, Eatontown, Shrewsbury Borough, Shrewsbury Township, Tinton Falls, Colts Neck, Freehold Township and Freehold Borough.)
Editors note: All candidates for any office are welcome to submit material to MMM. You don’t even have to be a candidate for office to submit. As long as I think your stuff will be of interest to my readers, I’ll probably publish it, unless it needs more than 30 seconds worth of editing. If your stuff needs lots of editing, I probably won’t open your second email.
If you quote me and stroke my ego, your chances of publication are very good. Send to Artvg at aol dot com.
Dan Jacobson lacks the character and the brains to be elected to public office. It goes without saying — and without having to hold a general election — that most voters around here feel the same way.
Dan,
There is no doubt you have some great communication skills. However, being pro choice and favoring same sex marriage is your downfall.
I suggest you speak with a strong religious scholar. You might just find the missing link in your life.
I wonder how many of you yahoos…yes, you “truth”…have ever put themselves out there to run for office instead of just posting idiotic and demeaning posts anonymously. I would bet none since you’re such cowards already.
Dan, after some research and consideration of the current state of affairs and the current function, or even dysfunction, of state government, and given the current choices, I believe Mary Pat and Caroline are the two candidates who are going to do the best job in the State Assembly representing my interests and the interests of the majority of my friends, family, neighbors and fellow private sector working taxpayers so I’m not going to vote for you and I’m going to work hard to make sure that others also vote for Mary Pat and Caroline. However, as I’ve said before, do keep up the hard work and thanks for being part of the process. As I’ve experienced, and I’m sure you already know, not winning an election doesn’t mean that your efforts don’t lead to real changes and serious discussions of the issues you advocate for.
And I do offer my moral support sincerely as I get a certain feeling of nostalgia reading your thoughts; your candor, style and approach really seem eerily familiar. If not for what I believe to be better candidates and representatives in Mary Pat Angelini and Caroline Casagrande, I’d probably even consider voting for you despite some ideological differences.
I’d second exactly what Rick said about the anonymous cowards and those who do attack you for actually standing up for what you believe in… but then I’m sure that agreeing with Rick would qualify me as an evil, socialist, gun grabbing gay advocate set on raising your taxes and taking your private property while killing babies and clubbing seals so that illegals can take over the nation, all things I’d feign an apologetic tone for while continuing on my merry way of course… so just for the record, and to clear myself of more such anonymous name calling I’ll just say this to get the cheap applause:
Rick: YOouR teh yaHoo and a loon!!! Go be a Socialist somewhere else you failed politician you!
There I told him. Good luck Dan.
Well, thanks Jimmy…I guess. Not sure that I would agree with all the crazy things you have me doing and believing in, but at least you use your real name and ran for office…in a beat you over the head kind a way.
James Hogan: Your comments are always well-considered and thoughtful and thanks for your positive words. I have voted for Mary Pat in the past, and I have always had positive things to say about Caroline. So I certainly respect your decision.
As I’ve stated repeatedly, I like all my opponents. Rather, it’s the whole system — in all its stifling ossification and absurdity — that pisses me off. Drives me up a wall. So I want to take a shot at that.
Rick Ambrosia: I understand your frustration at anonymous commentators. It is a bit cowardly.
When it comes to the anonymous comments about my candidacy on this blog the past few weeks, I’m actually baffled as to why people don’t use their real names. I have not read anything yet that would offend me or that I’d hold against someone.
Look, I’m all for expressing your true emotions in your writing, so I don’t think, for example, “Truth’s” comments saying I lack the character or brains to hold office are out of line. Don’t agree with them, of course. But as a candidate, how could you not expect some people to hold those opinions? Hell, maybe he’s right! After all, I’m a bit biased on the subject.
And the other anonymous comment above objecting to my stands on some moral issues — with the suggestion that I consult a religious scholar because the person thinks I’m missing something important in life — I thought was a very effective way to express their position. Because it shows a depth of sincere commitment to their views. Why that person wouldn’t want to identify themself is beyond me.
Dan Jacobson