The liberals that insisted all terrorist be afforded full civilian due process at trial under President Bush seem to have nothing to say today about President Obama killing an American citizen without a trial first.
How…predicatable.
Rick Ambrosia said at 11:27 am on September 30th, 2011:
That would be “some” liberals Tommy…not all. Nice to know that you are just like the rest and lump us all in one big pot.
I, for one, never thought that terrorists should be afforded full rights…and treason needs to be dealt with swiftly to save innocent lives.
Maybe you should not jump to conclusions…or I could say the same thing about you republicans…how predictable.
And where are the right wing ninnies on this blog that accuse Obama of being a Muslim and protecting his own? Oh I know you’ll think of something to bash Obama with even if he orders the death of a muslim terrorist. Seems to me your man Bush did a better job protecting his Saudi buddies- but I guess that’s not in the playbook….
And are Paulestinians supporters of Rand who think killing a terrorist is another example of “too much government”?
Bob English said at 5:46 pm on September 30th, 2011:
The weekend just got off to a great start!!!
You can say what you want about the President but you sure as hell can not say he is not tough on terrorists when there is a chance to kill them.
timing is everything in politics and government.. with unparalleled numbers in the proverbial political toilet currently, Milhous, (ever the totally self-centered egomaniac), is looking for ANYthing that will get some positive press and reaction, yes, even to this extent of drone- killings of terrorists, which,BTW, I do agree with.. but, the prime motive for this Administration is, and always has been, self-preservation, re-election, and furtherance of their socialist/statist agenda of complete government control of us and everything in this country, make no mistake about it.. any admin. takes the credit when something positive occurs, and this one is no exception..however, the NOT taking any blame for all their mistakes,mis-steps, and downright awful decisions, hopefully, will take them down, and change this direction, next year!..so, good riddance, ten times over, “Al,”and may many of your “apostles” follow you to your 97 virgins, or whatever!..
If the drone killing of terrorists could be timed for maximum political effect, Shrub would have had Bin Laden’s head on a stick on the eve of his re-election. It kills you that you can’t “own” the security issue when your nemesis routinely displays not only his willingness to be tough on terrorists, but his success in doing so. At least when Obama touts a mission accomplished, it is accomplished.
Obama must have, er, receive, superior intelligence to his predecessor. Or maybe he just bothers to read the memos.
The liberals that insisted all terrorist be afforded full civilian due process at trial under President Bush seem to have nothing to say today about President Obama killing an American citizen without a trial first.
How…predicatable.
That would be “some” liberals Tommy…not all. Nice to know that you are just like the rest and lump us all in one big pot.
I, for one, never thought that terrorists should be afforded full rights…and treason needs to be dealt with swiftly to save innocent lives.
Maybe you should not jump to conclusions…or I could say the same thing about you republicans…how predictable.
The Paulestinians are in a tizzy—further proof America’s enemies stick together.
And where are the right wing ninnies on this blog that accuse Obama of being a Muslim and protecting his own? Oh I know you’ll think of something to bash Obama with even if he orders the death of a muslim terrorist. Seems to me your man Bush did a better job protecting his Saudi buddies- but I guess that’s not in the playbook….
And are Paulestinians supporters of Rand who think killing a terrorist is another example of “too much government”?
The weekend just got off to a great start!!!
You can say what you want about the President but you sure as hell can not say he is not tough on terrorists when there is a chance to kill them.
Another one bites the dust an anothereronesgoneananotherones gone anotherone bites the dust
Unlike the left, we can give credit when it’s due———kudos Milhous.
timing is everything in politics and government.. with unparalleled numbers in the proverbial political toilet currently, Milhous, (ever the totally self-centered egomaniac), is looking for ANYthing that will get some positive press and reaction, yes, even to this extent of drone- killings of terrorists, which,BTW, I do agree with.. but, the prime motive for this Administration is, and always has been, self-preservation, re-election, and furtherance of their socialist/statist agenda of complete government control of us and everything in this country, make no mistake about it.. any admin. takes the credit when something positive occurs, and this one is no exception..however, the NOT taking any blame for all their mistakes,mis-steps, and downright awful decisions, hopefully, will take them down, and change this direction, next year!..so, good riddance, ten times over, “Al,”and may many of your “apostles” follow you to your 97 virgins, or whatever!..
If the drone killing of terrorists could be timed for maximum political effect, Shrub would have had Bin Laden’s head on a stick on the eve of his re-election. It kills you that you can’t “own” the security issue when your nemesis routinely displays not only his willingness to be tough on terrorists, but his success in doing so. At least when Obama touts a mission accomplished, it is accomplished.