O’Scanlon praises Supreme Court’s proposed Municipal Court Reforms—will introduce legislation to take the profit out of policing and local courts
Senator Declan O’Scanlon (R-Monmouth County) today issued praise to the Supreme Court Committee on Municipal Court Operations, Fines and Fees for their comprehensive report which, after a 16 month investigation, “revealed a number of significant concerns where aggressive reform is needed. Many of those issues identified by the Committee undermine both the administration of justice and the independence of the Municipal Courts.”
“In law enforcement and judicial systems, profit is the mortal enemy of justice,” Senator O’Scanlon said. “We must take real steps towards reforming municipal court and ticketing procedures. Policing for profit is an unacceptable practice that tarnishes the reputation of all our upstanding police officers and often results in devastating consequences for petty infractions.”
“Municipal Courts should be about the administration of justice, not a profit center to plug holes in local governments’ budgets,” O’Scanlon continued. “In the twenty-five years since our Courts were last reformed, too many towns have come to rely on fines to fund their municipal operations and too many local judges have turned into de facto tax collectors. This is not justice and it has to stop.”
Among the reforms that O’Scanlon will propose in legislation are:
- Enhanced screening and training for municipal court judges
- Extending the terms and create tenure for municipal court judges
- Removing fine revenue from municipal coffers and transfer it to the County level for dedicated distribution
- Increased use of technology in administering local justice.
- Encouraging court consolidation.
“Policing for profit has become the norm for too many municipalities. It has become so accepted that many local officials don’t believe they’re doing anything wrong. Pressure to write more tickets and generate more revenue is routinely applied to police. When considering the hiring of judges there is open discussion of how aggressive candidates will be in generating revenue. That perverts our justice system and damages peoples’ faith and trust in our police. Neither the institution nor our dedicated cops deserve that. Our overarching goal should be the greatest amount of compliance and safety with the LEAST amount of punishment. Ticket revenue needs to be used to modify behavior when necessary, not to balance budgets.”
O’Scanlon has been working with the Administrative Office of the Courts to ensure reforms are appropriate and effective. His reform plan announcement comes at the same time as the release of the Supreme Court Committee on Municipal Court Operations, Fines, and Fees report.
“We are grateful for the extensive work that the committee has done here in putting together forty-nine recommendations to address various corruption issues. Many of the issues and policy ideas we are tackling in our reforms are addressed in the report. I will continue to work with the Administrative Office of the Courts to ensure that our courts and police departments are about justice and public safety.”
O’Scanlon acknowledged that these reforms will be initially unpopular with municipal officials who have been using fines to balance their budgets. He challenges those officials to join him in continuing to reform government with greater efficiencies.
“When we implemented the 2% local spending cap eight years ago, many officials thought it was doomsday. But the best and brightest got to work and created savings and efficiencies,” O’Scanlon said. “Now many towns are consistently passing budgets within the cap while maintaining services. We need to keep doing that and more, especially regarding this issue which is one of justice and fundamental fairness.”
I am very happy with this and would like to donate to Senator Declan O’Scanlon’s future campaigns, is there a website or link to his campaign or office where such donations can be made as a sign of thanks for the good work being done? Thank you Senator!
PS, now about those speed limits that you’ve advocated changes to in the past. Asking too much for one day? 🙂
This laughabale….Can you imagine any town signing on to a bill that takes their ill gotten gains.
This is what will happen…write it down, sign and date it.
There will be a “deal” worked out where there will be a few very minor changes and the politicians will claim “VICTORY” over the corrupt local adminstrations, PDs and so called judges.
They will pat each other on the back and belly up to tbar for another swig at the public trough…ALL OF THEM
Tenure for judges???? So we will be stuck with bad ones…just like bad teachers that are virtually impossible to remove…and who is going to rat them out?
Forget the tenure for judges. Bad idea. What about the municipal judge that does 3 towns and wants to do 5 more? Today if a town has an “unprofessional or inept” judge you just don’t reappoint.