How can we sustain this system?
Wall Township Administrator Joseph Verruni is retiring from his $179,000 per year job, after 20 years of service, on June 1, 2012. He is 54 years old. His pension will be between $80,000 and $90,000 per year, according to a report in The Asbury Park Press.
This rant is not about Verruni.
As Wall is a wonderful place, I’m sure he did a terrific job over the last 20 years. I don’t necessarily begrudge him the $179,000 salary for the work he did (even though Monmouth County Administrator Teri O’Connor makes significantly less) But he’s 54 years old, starting a new career in the private sector, that will be supplemented by $2,500,000 if he lives another 30 years! That doesn’t include the tax payer funded health insurance that will keep him alive, hopefully for his sake and that of his family, more than 30 years!
If Verruni collects $85,000 per year for 30 years, he will have “earned” an additional $127,500 for every year he worked as Wall Township’s administrator.
I really should have taken a government job when I graduated from Georgetown in 1980.
This is not about Verruni. It is about a system that pays adults in the prime of their earning years the equivalent of full time wages not to work. Like my high school buddy who retired from the Bergenfield Police Department at 53 and takes home $20 per month less per month than he did when he put the uniform on every day. Or like the retired State Police Investigator, 47 years old, collecting a pension of $84,300 per year, who is Acting President of Brookdale Community College with a salary of $150,000 per year.
This system is not sustainable and it is not equitable.
The pension and benefit reform package that Governor Christie negotiated with the Democratic Legislature is an improvement of the previous system. Yet the new system is not sustainable over time either. We’re not feeling any of the pain yet.
Over the next 30 years, the state pension contribution will be $4.9 billion per year. The local government contributions will be $2.3 billion per year over the next 30 years. Both figures are on average. We’re “enjoying” the savings now with smaller pension contributions that must increase by $500 million per year until we’re “caught up” with all the contributions we haven’t made since 2000.
Unless there is significant economic growth, soon, we won’t be able to sustain this system without significant tax increases.
Who is going to be left to pay those taxes?
If we’re going to have a pension system for government employees, we shouldn’t be paying out until the retirees are 65 years old, or older as life expectancies increase.
I wonder what the Hornyck team in Marlboro has put into place to make sure that Jonathan Capp (township business administrator) has an appropriate salary and pension cap upon his retirement. Afterall, with all that the two jonny’s are doing in Marlboro, he best have a plan in place prior to their demise in the upcoming months.
of course this is unsustainable ,everybody knows this .Christie did the unions a big favor by making a few cutbacks ,but nearly not enough ,you can blame CC for not making a yearly contribution ,but fact is that it really wouldn’t matter .If the pension met the phony actuarial assumptions of over 8 percent the pension wouldn’t need any contributions .the pension is up 6 billion over 10 years which is about 0.5 % per year..the pension has about 4 to 8 years of life left in it …whoever is governor then better have a bunker to live in …because taxpayers are fleeing this state ,it’s the best way to shed oneself of all that debt built into the pension system …as for the workers when the checks stop coming ….Corzine has already gave his comment on that …”I simply don’t know where the money is” ….