Proposed TSA Slogans
Good spam
- Can’t see London, can’t see France, unless we see your underpants
- Grope discounts available
- Only we know if Lady Gaga is really a lady.
- Don’t worry, my hands are still warm from the last guy.
- Throw a few back at the airport Chili’s and you won’t even notice.
- Wanna fly? Drop you fly.
- We’ve handled more balls than Barney Frank.
- We are now free to move about your pants.
- It’s not a grope, it’s a freedom pat.
- When in doubt, we make you whip it out.
- TSA: Touchin’ , Squeezin’, Arrestin’
Add yours in the comments
Anyone who feels this new safety measure is offensive, needs a reality check.
I won’t go on a plane if everyone isn’t checked.
You whiners would be the first to complain if a plane was brought down from someone hiding a bomb.
Give me a break!
Typical liberal response–treat the people as the enemy—-you can’t have guns, sugar, salt, suv’s, trans-fats,etc–and then get in line like a nice peon while we humiliate you.
We need to stop Terrorists, not frisk every
law-abiding citizens.
Ms Pelosi, here’s two solutions–profile
the passengers, let me carry my legal gun
with me, and let everyone know l have it.
l will not allowed myself to be treated like a criminal—it’s people who blow us up, not 3 oz shampoo bottles!!!
Thank you idiots who voted for “Hope and Change”. The politically correct culture refuses to “profile” would be terrorists (duh – Islamic extremists are not Catholic nuns). Israeli and El-Al procedure is to profile and when was the last time an El-Al flight was flown into a building (or even hijacked)?
Perhaps Janet Napolitano and Barney Frank look forward to being “patted down”, or being seen naked by the scanners (uggh), but most normal Americans like to protect their privacy rights.
What ever happened to the Fourth Amendment in the Bill of Rights?
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
If TSA employees are sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution (like military personnel and elected officials) they should be terminated for violating their oath of office.
First of all I am not a liberal, secondly I don’t feel my constitutional rights are being violated because of these new safety measures. If searching protects lives, then that I’m all for it.
Paranoia is taking over common sense.
So like Joe S said, it’s OK to grope and strip search lawful American citizens, but somehow it’s against human decency to ask someone in Arizona if they have proper documentation to be in this country
You do know there’s a name for someone who claims someone else’s words as their own.
http://www.expressjetpilots.com/the-pipe/showthread.php?40002-This-looks-like-FUN!&p=426990
Nice try Art but as is usual with you, close but no cigar. Just because you threw up “Good Spam” you think you’ve properly dealt with the matter. The fact is your “Good Spam” is meaningless unless under “author” it is posted “Internet Blogger” NOT Art Gallagher. I know you got where you are by ignoring pesky things like details but remember, “The devil’s in the details.”
Did the devil make you do it?
To those of you like “TheDigger” that point to the superiority of Israeli security while railing against the searching of a Catholic nun, you should realize that in Israel, terrorists routinely dress as ultra-Orthodox Jews or rabbis. It is certainly not a stretch that a terrorist here would disguise herself as a nun. When I hear the simple minded rants on this blog, I now understand how 911 happened with a Republican reading the security reports.